.

 

Mr President,

In all due respect Sir..

While many focus upon Iran's 'intent' re Uranium and 'time to operational bomb' and attendant extortion scheme,  note Tehran advantaged by everyone focusing upon 'that' which they expect everyone to be focused upon.  

"Proliferating states using designs of intermediate
sophistication could produce weapons with assured yields
substantially higher than the kiloton-range made possible
with a simple, first- generation nuclear device."

Don,  reactor grade plutonium is hazardous from the point of view of diversion to nuclear weaponry.  US early 1960's conducted tests, not for engineering efficiency, but to assure eventual 'rogue aspirational regime potential/proliferation' assessment under (enemy) guise of 'peaceful civilian program' i.e. Don, a comparatively 'crude device' might serve to initiate a 'fusion train' of unanticipated events orders of magnitude in yield above prevailing narrative.  

i.e. Tehran willing (expecting) to soon give more than might be expected, in exchange for things IAEA itself admits to have lost continuity/awareness of.  

    

    re .. Gas/Brake

This (image) might appear as counter productive, but in fact (often) counter-intuitive.. edge operation requires (among other things) low latency, and positive continuity.

People who road race 'vehicles' for a living, understand the foot/brake dichotomy (image)